The court of, a famous and well-known Qazi of his time.

Introduction

The tale unfolds in the court of Qazi Ibn Abi Laili, a renowned judge of his time, where two women present their intertwined stories of love, marriage, divorce, and inheritance. Each narrative intricately weaves through relationships, misunderstandings, and unexpected twists, ultimately leading to a complex legal conundrum for the esteemed Qazi to unravel.

Two women reached the court of Qazi Ibn Abi Laili, who was a famous and well-known Qazi of his time.
Qazi asked.
Which of you should speak first?

Among them, the elderly woman said to the other, you should put your words in front of Qazi Sahib.

She began saying, at that point my uncle’s child sent a message of engagement, he got me hitched to him, and a long time has passed since my marriage.

The hitched life was going well, one day my fatherly close relative came to my house and advertised my spouse a moment’s marriage with her girl, with the condition that the matter of the primary spouse (i.e. me) ought to be given over to my fatherly close relative.

My spouse acknowledged the condition of wedding a virgin young lady.

On the honeymoon night of my husband’s second marriage, my paternal grandmother came to me and told me that I had married my daughter to your husband.
Your husband has handed over your case to me, I am divorcing you by advocating for your husband.

Judge, I got divorced.

After some time, my paternal grandmother’s husband arrived tired from the journey. He was an artist and a wonderful individual.
I sat down before him and said to him, will you wed me?
He was not upbeat, but he promptly concurred, I made a condition before him.
To handed over the matter of his first wife (that is, my paternal aunt) to me. He did the same.
Qazi surprised again?
She said, Qazi Sahib, the story is not over yet.
After some time my poet husband died, and my aunt came demanding an inheritance, I told her that my husband had divorced you in his life.
Now you have no share in the inheritance.
The argument lasted for a long time, during which my period also passed. One day, my mother-in-law came to my house with her girl and son-in-law (my ex-husband). And made my same ex-husband arbiter in an inheritance dispute. He saw me after many years. A man never forgets his first love.
So, meeting me like this, his first love got upset, I said to him, will you marry me again?
He said yes.

After some time, my paternal grandmother’s husband arrived tired from the journey.

He was an artist and a wonderful individual.

I sat down before him and said to him, will you wed me?
He was not upbeat, but he quickly concurred, I made a condition before him.
To handed over the matter of his first wife (that is, my paternal aunt) to me. He did the same.
Qazi surprised again?
She said, Qazi Sahib, the story is not over yet.
After some time my poet husband died, and my aunt came demanding an inheritance, I told her that my husband had divorced you in his life.

Presently you’ve got no share within the legacy.

The argument lasted for a long time, during which my period also passed. One day, my mother-in-law came to my house with her girl and son-in-law (my ex-husband). And made my same ex-husband arbiter in an inheritance dispute. He saw me after many years.

A man never overlooks his to begin with cherish.

So, meeting me like this, his first love got upset, I said to him, will you marry me again?
He said yes.

I made a condition in front of him that he should hand over the matter of his first wife (my paternal grandmother’s daughter) to me, and he did so.
I married my ex-husband and divorced his wife by advocating for the husband.
Qazi Ibn Abi Laili sat down holding his head and then asked:
What is the problem now in this case?
My Aunt said:
Qazi Sahib, is it not forbidden that this girl divorced both my daughter and me, then took my husband and my daughter’s husband, and not only that, she also took the inheritance of both husbands in her name?

Qazi Ibn Abi Layli said:

I don’t see anything forbidden in this case, divorce is also permissible, a lawyer is also permissible, and after divorce, the wife can go back to her former husband.
Provided that in between she got married to someone else and got divorced or her husband died, the same thing happened in your story.
After that, the Qazi narrated this incident to Caliph Mansoor, and the Caliph burst out laughing.
And he said that whoever digs a pit for his brother will fall into that pit himself.
Book: Jama al-Jawahar fi Al-Malh Wal-Nodar – Al-Husri (Translation from Arabic:

Conclusion

In the enigmatic tale brought forth before Qazi Ibn Abi Laili, the intricate web of relationships and legal disputes culminates in a profound lesson: “Whoever digs a pit for his brother will fall into that pit himself.” The profound wisdom encapsulated in this simple yet profound statement serves as a reminder of the consequences of deceit, manipulation, and ill intentions.

FAQs.

What is the significance of the court of Qazi Ibn Abi Laili?

• Qazi Ibn Abi Laili symbolizes justice and wisdom in resolving legal disputes and unraveling complex narratives within the court of law. His role in the tale reflects the importance of fair judgment and equitable solutions.

What are the key events depicted in the narrative presented to Qazi Ibn Abi Laili?

• The narrative involves multiple marriages, divorces, inheritance disputes, and the intricate dynamics of familial relationships. Each event contributes to the unfolding complexity of the story and the subsequent legal deliberations.

What is the underlying message conveyed by the conclusion of the tale?

• The conclusion emphasizes the universal principle of karma or retribution, highlighting the consequences of deceit and malice. The adage “Whoever digs a pit for his brother will fall into that pit himself” serves as a cautionary reminder of the repercussions of one’s actions.

How does Qazi Ibn Abi Laili resolve the legal dispute presented to him?

• Qazi Ibn Abi Laili employs his wisdom and knowledge of Islamic law to analyze the intricacies of the case. He concludes that the actions of the individuals involved, while morally questionable, do not violate legal principles. His judgment underscores the importance of adhering to ethical standards in personal and legal matters.

What is the broader significance of the tale beyond its legal implications?

• The tale transcends its legal framework to offer insights into human nature, relationships, and the consequences of moral choices. It prompts reflection on the complexities of life and the interplay between fate, justice, and personal responsibility.